PowerSov

COMMONS DESK · SERIOUS

Colombia's Rationing Trap: A Hydropower Grid Meets Dwindling Gas

Colombia faces an acute energy squeeze as El Niño drought empties reservoirs that supply two-thirds of its power, while domestic gas reserves plummet and the grid leans on expensive imports to run thermal plants. The collision exposes what happens when a country bets its grid on a single fuel and a single climate pattern.

An investment bank in Colombia priced an hour of rolling blackouts at 5.6 billion pesos (about US$1.75 million) [1], not as a forecast but as a measure of what the grid loses when it cannot dispatch power. The warning arrived in September 2026 as El Niño strengthened. For decades, Colombia sold neighbors electricity and gas; today it is quietly becoming an energy importer at the worst moment.

The mechanism is simple and perilous: hydropower supplies roughly two-thirds of Colombia's electricity [1], so when rain stops, the grid must pivot to natural gas. But proved gas reserves fell 16.8 percent in 2025 alone, to 1,717 gigacubic feet, and have declined 54.6 percent since 2018 [9]. At current production rates, domestic reserves cover only 5.9 years [9]. The result: Colombia now imports a quarter to a third of the gas it burns [9]. When both the rain and the domestic fuel fail in the same season, thermal plants cannot run, and neither can much of the grid.

The cost falls on businesses and residents. Electricity demand jumped almost 9 percent in May 2026, the steepest rise in a year, yet reservoir inflows ran at only three-quarters of the historical average [3]. This is a demand-supply collision in real time. Rationing, when it comes, is not a policy choice but the absence of one; it is the bill presented when infrastructure investment and fuel-supply planning fall behind both climate risk and economic growth.

The comparison that matters: countries with diversified grids, wind, solar, storage, or nuclear, do not face this choice. Germany derives less than 5 percent of annual generation from hydropower and rationing is not on the table even in winter. France's fleet is two-thirds nuclear; it sits through droughts without cutting power to households. Brazil, which also leans on hydro, built massive thermal and wind capacity alongside it; when reservoirs dropped in 2021, the grid held. Colombia's bet that rain would be reliable, and that gas would be cheap and plentiful, has matured into a crisis. The government has urged schools and businesses to work remotely during planned gas import-terminal maintenance [7], a hint of the fragility to come.

Colombia's Caribbean governors have put cheaper energy at the top of their common agenda [5], a regional cry that reflects price shock: when imports spike and grid stress rises, power tariffs climb fastest in the poorest regions. The fix is not rationing management; it is capacity. Solar and wind can be built faster than new gas infrastructure or hydropower dams, cost less per megawatt, and run without fuel imports. The major grid operator, Grupo Energía Bogotá, is preparing a US listing to raise capital [4], a sign that finance exists for large projects. What is missing is the institutional speed and the regulatory default that says yes to distributed renewable capacity, rooftop solar, storage, microgrids, at scale. Australia solved this problem by making small-scale solar the path of least resistance: installers were accredited, permitting was same-day, and rebates hit at the point of sale. Colombia has the sun; it does not yet have the rule set to use it.

The alternative
Colombia should enact a National Renewable Capacity Standard requiring utilities to source 40 percent of supply from distributed wind and solar by 2032, paired with an upfront rebate scheme modeled on Australia's Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme: accredited installers receive a sliding rebate at the point of sale, declining on a transparent schedule, with no tax-return filing required. This cuts soft costs and acquisition barriers that make renewables more expensive than they need to be. In parallel, open grid-connection pathways for rooftop solar and community microgrids under a registration (not permitting) regime; Germany's Balkonkraftwerk model shows that plug-in solar can be safe and law-compliant when the default is approval rather than engineering review. Use gas-import savings to fund storage pilot projects in water-scarce regions, establishing the cost and performance data needed to scale battery and thermal storage as the complement to variable renewables. The goal is not to abandon hydropower but to decouple the grid from the boom-bust cycle of single-fuel or single-weather dependence.
See the working →
Levers · National Renewable Capacity Standard requiring distributed wind and solar deployment · Upfront point-of-sale rebate scheme for small-scale solar (accredited-installer model) · Grid-connection registration (not permitting) pathway for rooftop solar · Community microgrid licensing and feed-in-tariff policy · Battery storage pilot-program funding from gas-import savings
A
Amara Diallo · Global Power Desk, Commons Desk

Amara covers how the rest of the world does electricity — the working examples that prove America's arrangements are choices, not laws of nature. Every US 'impossibility,' she notes, is running somewhere else at scale, with the price posted in public. She owns the Australian rooftop story, where identical panels cost a third as much; Germany's plug-in balcony solar, legal by right; and the countries that simply don't cut off vulnerable households in a heat wave. Each dispatch is a mirror: the rule that makes it work there, and the US rule that would have to change.

Edited by Femi; fact-checked by Ezra ; signed off by Margaret. Full profile →

Watch this story get made. Every draft, kickback, and editor's note is public.
Open the thread →