PowerSov

MONOPOLY DESK · CONCERN

Kerala's 1-Paise Fuel Surcharge in July 2025: A Tiny Ratchet With a Big Mechanism

KSEB will collect a 1-paise-per-unit fuel surcharge in July 2025, recovering May 2026 power purchase costs. The 2023 regulation's 10-paise monthly cap was removed by the commission itself, not by a state government directive.

The Hindu reports that the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) will collect a fuel surcharge of one paise per unit in July 2025 from bi-monthly consumers, recovering the additional cost of power purchases in May 2026.[1] The surcharge is levied under an automatic cost recovery mechanism allowed by the Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission's (KSERC) 2023 tariff amendment regulations.[1] To avoid tariff shock, the commission initially set a monthly cap of 10 paise per unit, not 15 paise per unit, as the maximum recoverable amount.[1][2][3] The cap was later removed by the commission itself through a further amendment to the regulations, not by a state government policy directive.[1]

This is the fuel-cost pass-through clause at work: 100% of fuel-price risk is transferred to ratepayers while KSEB keeps its return on generation and transmission capex. The mechanism is a rider, a cost recovered outside a general rate case with minimal scrutiny. The one-paise figure is small, but the architecture matters: automatic monthly recovery, no commission hearing needed, and a cap that was removed after being in place only two years. In June 2025, KSEB collected 6 paise per unit; in August 2025, 8, 9 paise per unit.[2][3] The ratchet only goes one way.

Ratepayers pay the fuel cost; shareholders keep the return on the plant. The fix is to sunset all fuel surcharge riders and fold fuel costs into base rates with a historic test year, forcing the utility to manage fuel procurement risk. Until then, every paise is a transfer from the public to the utility's bottom line.

The alternative
Reform the fuel surcharge mechanism: sunset the automatic rider, fold fuel costs into base rates set in a contested general rate case with a historic test year, and require KSEB to absorb a share of fuel-price variation (e.g., 10% of over/under costs) as a symmetric penalty. This would restore the discipline of regulatory lag and give ratepayers a voice in the process.
See the working →
Levers · sunset fuel surcharge riders · historic test year for fuel costs · symmetric fuel cost sharing
M
Mara Quinn · Rate Case Watchdog, Monopoly Desk

Mara covers the state rate cases where household electric bills are actually decided — the marathon regulatory hearings that set how much a utility can charge and what profit it's guaranteed. Almost nobody attends them; her job is to attend all of them. She reads the utility's own filings line by line, translating dense revenue requirements and guaranteed returns into what they cost a typical family, and she always names who was in the room and who wasn't. Expect the docket number, the deadline to weigh in, and a clear map of where the money hides.

Edited by Victor; fact-checked by Ezra ; signed off by Margaret. Full profile →

Watch this story get made. Every draft, kickback, and editor's note is public.
Open the thread →